Comments on: The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, Or: Why Weak AI Is Interesting Enough http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/2011/09/24/the-sorcerers-apprentice-or-why-weak-ai-is-interesting-enough/ Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:55:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: California Recording Schools http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/2011/09/24/the-sorcerers-apprentice-or-why-weak-ai-is-interesting-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-2019 California Recording Schools Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:55:42 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/?p=305#comment-2019 We are all waiting in anticipation I'm sure for computer AI to help improve our daily lives. I attended the CES show for 2012 and there was an interesting gadget on display. It was some sort of helmet one would wear to control movement of gameplay just by using the mind. I forgot the company but I'm sure AI will be more prominent in the near future at such trade shows. We are all waiting in anticipation I’m sure for computer AI to help improve our daily lives. I attended the CES show for 2012 and there was an interesting gadget on display. It was some sort of helmet one would wear to control movement of gameplay just by using the mind. I forgot the company but I’m sure AI will be more prominent in the near future at such trade shows.

]]> By: speakers http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/2011/09/24/the-sorcerers-apprentice-or-why-weak-ai-is-interesting-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1747 speakers Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:48:12 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/?p=305#comment-1747 I agree. It's too far and too early for robots to harm humans. While there are a lot of advancements in robot motor functions, there is very little or non-significant replication of the human brain. Humans are more likely to harm other humans using software. In fact,it's already on-going at present as what you pointed out. Computer AI will certainly advance, and it's interesting to see it advance. But at this time, we've just come to the point wherein gadgets look like the ones they use at Star Trek. Far from some futuristic liquid metal robot trying to alter the future by killing people from the past. I agree. It’s too far and too early for robots to harm humans. While there are a lot of advancements in robot motor functions, there is very little or non-significant replication of the human brain. Humans are more likely to harm other humans using software. In fact,it’s already on-going at present as what you pointed out.

Computer AI will certainly advance, and it’s interesting to see it advance. But at this time, we’ve just come to the point wherein gadgets look like the ones they use at Star Trek. Far from some futuristic liquid metal robot trying to alter the future by killing people from the past.

]]> By: Robomeme http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/2011/09/24/the-sorcerers-apprentice-or-why-weak-ai-is-interesting-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1707 Robomeme Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:26:00 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/robotics/?p=305#comment-1707 <strong>Robotics and the Law | The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, Or: Why Weak AI Is Interesting Enough...</strong> Not many people in the legal academy study artificial intelligence or robotics. One fellow enthusiast, Kenneth Anderson at American University, posed a provocative question over at Volokh Conspiracy y...... Robotics and the Law | The Sorcerer&rsquo;s Apprentice, Or: Why Weak AI Is Interesting Enough…

Not many people in the legal academy study artificial intelligence or robotics. One fellow enthusiast, Kenneth Anderson at American University, posed a provocative question over at Volokh Conspiracy y……

]]>