http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2013/02/01/the-drug-labeling-experts-theyre-not-who-you-think/ Wed, 15 May 2013 21:56:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2013/02/01/the-drug-labeling-experts-theyre-not-who-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-108113 Jacob S Sherkow Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:34:21 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=3444#comment-108113 There certainly is the possibility of a circuit split. There could even be one already. Whether the Supreme Court is interested, I don't know. It might "fester," as you suggest, especially because it's something easily resolvable by litigants--just choose the "right" expert for your circuit. There certainly is the possibility of a circuit split. There could even be one already. Whether the Supreme Court is interested, I don’t know. It might “fester,” as you suggest, especially because it’s something easily resolvable by litigants–just choose the “right” expert for your circuit.

]]> http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2013/02/01/the-drug-labeling-experts-theyre-not-who-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-107997 hgreely Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:26:10 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=3444#comment-107997 Is there the possibility of a circuit split on this point? And, if so, might the Supreme Court be interested? I wonder if it would fall below their threshold for concern and so might continue to fester as an unresolved circuit split. Thoughts? Is there the possibility of a circuit split on this point? And, if so, might the Supreme Court be interested? I wonder if it would fall below their threshold for concern and so might continue to fester as an unresolved circuit split. Thoughts?

]]>