<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Digest, 2/22/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2011/02/22/the-daily-digest-22211/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2011/02/22/the-daily-digest-22211/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: London Counselling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2011/02/22/the-daily-digest-22211/comment-page-1/#comment-13484</link>
		<dc:creator>London Counselling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=1769#comment-13484</guid>
		<description>Definitely makes you wonder if a psychiatrist should always cosign a will to verify that the decedent was truly&quot;of sound mind&quot; when will was executed.  I have seen presented cases of several heavily disputed wills when the decendent was extremely wealthy and so well-insulated that there is a definite question of undue influence. Wonderful case for dying poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely makes you wonder if a psychiatrist should always cosign a will to verify that the decedent was truly&#8221;of sound mind&#8221; when will was executed.  I have seen presented cases of several heavily disputed wills when the decendent was extremely wealthy and so well-insulated that there is a definite question of undue influence. Wonderful case for dying poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
