<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEWS FLASH:  DC Circuit Continues Stay of Judge Lamberth&#8217;s Injunction Pending the Conclusion of the Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/28/news-flash-dc-circuit-continues-stay-of-judge-lamberths-injunction-pending-the-conclusion-of-the-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/28/news-flash-dc-circuit-continues-stay-of-judge-lamberths-injunction-pending-the-conclusion-of-the-appeal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Good news for embryonic stem cell research: Judge Lamberth rules for the NIH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/28/news-flash-dc-circuit-continues-stay-of-judge-lamberths-injunction-pending-the-conclusion-of-the-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-16477</link>
		<dc:creator>Good news for embryonic stem cell research: Judge Lamberth rules for the NIH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/28/news-flash-dc-circuit-continues-stay-of-judge-lamberths-injunction-pending-the-conclusion-of-the-appeal/#comment-16477</guid>
		<description>[...] allowing NIH to continue to fund the research while the appeal was pending. Stay, Post 1; Stay, Post 2. On December 6, 2010, the court heard oral argument and on April 29, 2011, the court reversed.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] allowing NIH to continue to fund the research while the appeal was pending. Stay, Post 1; Stay, Post 2. On December 6, 2010, the court heard oral argument and on April 29, 2011, the court reversed.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
