<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An interim update on the stem cell litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/22/an-interim-update-on-the-stem-cell-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/22/an-interim-update-on-the-stem-cell-litigation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Good news for embryonic stem cell research: Judge Lamberth rules for the NIH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/22/an-interim-update-on-the-stem-cell-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-12988</link>
		<dc:creator>Good news for embryonic stem cell research: Judge Lamberth rules for the NIH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/09/22/an-interim-update-on-the-stem-cell-litigation/#comment-12988</guid>
		<description>[...] stayed the injunction, allowing NIH to continue to fund the research while the appeal was pending. Stay, Post 1; Stay, Post 2. On December 6, 2010, the court heard oral argument and on April 29, 2011, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stayed the injunction, allowing NIH to continue to fund the research while the appeal was pending. Stay, Post 1; Stay, Post 2. On December 6, 2010, the court heard oral argument and on April 29, 2011, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
