<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bilski’s Impact on Pending Biotech Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/06/28/bilski%E2%80%99s-impact-on-pending-biotech-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/06/28/bilski%e2%80%99s-impact-on-pending-biotech-cases/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/06/28/bilski%e2%80%99s-impact-on-pending-biotech-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-4189</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=1437#comment-4189</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court today granted Prometheus&#039; petition for certiorari, vacated the decision, and remanded to the Federal Circuit for consideration in light of the Bilski decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court today granted Prometheus&#8217; petition for certiorari, vacated the decision, and remanded to the Federal Circuit for consideration in light of the Bilski decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
