<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: fMRI-Based Lie Detection Excluded After Daubert Hearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/06/01/fmri-based-lie-detection-excluded-after-daubert-hearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/06/01/fmri-based-lie-detection-excluded-after-daubert-hearing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary James Smith v. State of Maryland &#171; Reasonable Excuse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/06/01/fmri-based-lie-detection-excluded-after-daubert-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-23758</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary James Smith v. State of Maryland &#171; Reasonable Excuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=1234#comment-23758</guid>
		<description>[...] conducted by rival company Cephos, first in New York [1, 2] in 2010 and then again in Tennessee [1, 2, 3, 4] later that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conducted by rival company Cephos, first in New York [1, 2] in 2010 and then again in Tennessee [1, 2, 3, 4] later that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
