http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/05/05/breaking-news-fmri-lie-detection-evidence-excluded-in-ny-court-2/ Thu, 09 May 2013 20:20:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/05/05/breaking-news-fmri-lie-detection-evidence-excluded-in-ny-court-2/comment-page-1/#comment-23754 Gary James Smith v. State of Maryland « Reasonable Excuse Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:29:29 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=1218#comment-23754 [...] of hearings as potential evidence, with tests conducted by rival company Cephos, first in New York [1, 2] in 2010 and then again in Tennessee [1, 2, 3, 4] later that [...] [...] of hearings as potential evidence, with tests conducted by rival company Cephos, first in New York [1, 2] in 2010 and then again in Tennessee [1, 2, 3, 4] later that [...]

]]> http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/05/05/breaking-news-fmri-lie-detection-evidence-excluded-in-ny-court-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12618 Rufus Gibson jr. Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:46:17 +0000 http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/?p=1218#comment-12618 If this were a case with no other physical evidence, and circumstantial, then mri lie detection would not be about just securing convictions, but about finding the truth... As it should be. This statement comes from person who spent 7 1/2 years in prison for crime he never committed. If this were a case with no other physical evidence, and circumstantial, then mri lie detection would not be about just securing convictions, but about finding the truth… As it should be. This statement comes from person who spent 7 1/2 years in prison for crime he never committed.

]]>