<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got Questions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hanokh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanokh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>Dear Faye,
  Thanks for taking the time to answer all these questions. I have some technical questions regarding the application requirements. I am an American-Israeli, born and raised in the US. I withdrew from the Naval Academy after 3 semesters in order to come to Israel and serve in the military. I am now finishing my BA in Israel and am confused about whether I am supposed to apply as a foreign applicant or not. Also, my official name in Israel is different than in the US, meaning my degree and transcript (and I would imagine my LSAT scores) will be issued in my Israeli name, not the name matching my US Social Security number. How should I write my name on the application and relevant documents so as to minimize any possibility for confusion? Will a simple photocopy of my passports suffice as proof that both names refer to me? Finally, should I request from the Naval Academy to send my transcript, or is it irrelevant because I left 8 years ago without having completed the degree there?

I would greatly appreciate any insight you may have about my situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Faye,<br />
  Thanks for taking the time to answer all these questions. I have some technical questions regarding the application requirements. I am an American-Israeli, born and raised in the US. I withdrew from the Naval Academy after 3 semesters in order to come to Israel and serve in the military. I am now finishing my BA in Israel and am confused about whether I am supposed to apply as a foreign applicant or not. Also, my official name in Israel is different than in the US, meaning my degree and transcript (and I would imagine my LSAT scores) will be issued in my Israeli name, not the name matching my US Social Security number. How should I write my name on the application and relevant documents so as to minimize any possibility for confusion? Will a simple photocopy of my passports suffice as proof that both names refer to me? Finally, should I request from the Naval Academy to send my transcript, or is it irrelevant because I left 8 years ago without having completed the degree there?</p>
<p>I would greatly appreciate any insight you may have about my situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faye Deal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Faye Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Vivi:

You&#039;re educated in China and while you&#039;ve received an MA degree from here in the U.S., I will consider you as a foreign applicant in the application process.  For you, primarily, this means that I will need to focus strongly on your communication skills - both written and verbal.  Law school is intense - writing, reading and speaking are crucial elements.  If your language skills are not up to par, the next three years will be difficult. This means that I will scrutinize your LSAT writing sample, I will scrutinize your personal statement, I will take very seriously what your recommenders may say about your English skills. 

The LSAT, in general, will need to be very strong.  Ideally, the LSAT should be properly studied for and taken once.  Reality shows this is not always the case, but you need to keep in mind that every time you retake the LSAT we expect your score to go up - familiarity with the test accounts for this.  Now, if there is a noticeable gap between scores, you should tell us why you think that happened - in an addendum and not in your personal statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivi:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re educated in China and while you&#8217;ve received an MA degree from here in the U.S., I will consider you as a foreign applicant in the application process.  For you, primarily, this means that I will need to focus strongly on your communication skills &#8211; both written and verbal.  Law school is intense &#8211; writing, reading and speaking are crucial elements.  If your language skills are not up to par, the next three years will be difficult. This means that I will scrutinize your LSAT writing sample, I will scrutinize your personal statement, I will take very seriously what your recommenders may say about your English skills. </p>
<p>The LSAT, in general, will need to be very strong.  Ideally, the LSAT should be properly studied for and taken once.  Reality shows this is not always the case, but you need to keep in mind that every time you retake the LSAT we expect your score to go up &#8211; familiarity with the test accounts for this.  Now, if there is a noticeable gap between scores, you should tell us why you think that happened &#8211; in an addendum and not in your personal statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faye Deal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Faye Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Josh:

Don&#039;t sell yourself short on what you believe your personal statement will convey to us. Don&#039;t take on the burden of thinking you need to stand out amongst all other applicants.  Many times, perhaps even most times, I am more dazzled by the &quot;quiet&quot; statements - those that tell me via the written word about how you think and what you think.  

I&#039;d like to hear about how you&#039;re spending your time so it makes good sense to tell me that you&#039;re heading off to live in another culture.  You can use your resume for this if you feel the personal statement is not the best place to highlight this.  Remember that I want to know what you&#039;re doing and what you&#039;re up to because this helps us to better gauge the kind of member of the SLS community you are likely to become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh:</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t sell yourself short on what you believe your personal statement will convey to us. Don&#8217;t take on the burden of thinking you need to stand out amongst all other applicants.  Many times, perhaps even most times, I am more dazzled by the &#8220;quiet&#8221; statements &#8211; those that tell me via the written word about how you think and what you think.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to hear about how you&#8217;re spending your time so it makes good sense to tell me that you&#8217;re heading off to live in another culture.  You can use your resume for this if you feel the personal statement is not the best place to highlight this.  Remember that I want to know what you&#8217;re doing and what you&#8217;re up to because this helps us to better gauge the kind of member of the SLS community you are likely to become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>vivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Dear Faye:
Thank you so much for launching such a wonderful blog. I have three questions:
1 I was born in P.R.China. I obtained a B.A from a university in China and a M.A from a US graduate school. In this case, I fall into the &quot;Asian&quot; category according to LSAC. I am wondering when you review my application, you will use the standard of URM or Asian American or in general as foreign student. Does being a foreigner contribute to the diversity consideration?
2 When reviewing LSAT score, do you expect a foreign student to have a higher score than average US student in order to demonstrate her/his language capability in succeeding future law school life? Or you will take into account the fact that I am not native speaker which expose me more obstacles than common US students?
3 With regards to addendum about multiple lsat score, what explanation do you think function as a reasonable one so that reviewer would consider less about lower score and focus more on highest score? For my case, I used to be very bad at standardized exam. I had extraordinary academic performance from elementary school to high school that allow me to skip each single entrance exam and be automatically admitted into school including best university in China. Therefore lack of experience for big exams which have crucial impact on stage of life, I suffered panic attack and cold feet when I took LSATs. But I finally managed to defeat those negative mentality haunting me so many years and got a decent LSAT score in recent exam. Moreover my lsat scores show a growing trend which demonstrates my ability to learn. I am wondering if this contributes as a good explanation for multiple score in addendum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Faye:<br />
Thank you so much for launching such a wonderful blog. I have three questions:<br />
1 I was born in P.R.China. I obtained a B.A from a university in China and a M.A from a US graduate school. In this case, I fall into the &#8220;Asian&#8221; category according to LSAC. I am wondering when you review my application, you will use the standard of URM or Asian American or in general as foreign student. Does being a foreigner contribute to the diversity consideration?<br />
2 When reviewing LSAT score, do you expect a foreign student to have a higher score than average US student in order to demonstrate her/his language capability in succeeding future law school life? Or you will take into account the fact that I am not native speaker which expose me more obstacles than common US students?<br />
3 With regards to addendum about multiple lsat score, what explanation do you think function as a reasonable one so that reviewer would consider less about lower score and focus more on highest score? For my case, I used to be very bad at standardized exam. I had extraordinary academic performance from elementary school to high school that allow me to skip each single entrance exam and be automatically admitted into school including best university in China. Therefore lack of experience for big exams which have crucial impact on stage of life, I suffered panic attack and cold feet when I took LSATs. But I finally managed to defeat those negative mentality haunting me so many years and got a decent LSAT score in recent exam. Moreover my lsat scores show a growing trend which demonstrates my ability to learn. I am wondering if this contributes as a good explanation for multiple score in addendum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-525</guid>
		<description>This has all been really good to look at!  Thank you so much for this post.  I was really curious as to how things would be weighted for me as &quot;just another undergrad&quot;.

I&#039;m curious about one thing still, though.  I have fairly high academic credentials, especially for the schools that I intend to apply to.  However, when it comes to my personal statement, I&#039;ve been finding myself somewhat limited.  Every example I&#039;ve read online has dimmed my hopes more and more.  I&#039;ve never lived in an Ethiopian village helping to carry water and I haven&#039;t managed a team of 100 while we turned around a failing business.  I understand that these examples are the exceptions, not the norms... but I&#039;m unsure as to how to make myself stand out as an applicant.  I definitely have passion, drive, motivation, and a million other traits that every applicant and their dogs claim to demonstrate, but I feel that this will definitely be the weakest part of my application.

Will above-average academic accomplishments in a business program combined with a demonstrated focus on globalization and cultural literacy help to balance out a personal statement that merely meets expectations rather than dazzling admissions officers?  As an example, I&#039;ve spent four years learning a less-common language and will soon be departing to spend several months living in another culture.  Are these things helpful for an application?  And can I list intentions on my statement, or only accomplishments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has all been really good to look at!  Thank you so much for this post.  I was really curious as to how things would be weighted for me as &#8220;just another undergrad&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about one thing still, though.  I have fairly high academic credentials, especially for the schools that I intend to apply to.  However, when it comes to my personal statement, I&#8217;ve been finding myself somewhat limited.  Every example I&#8217;ve read online has dimmed my hopes more and more.  I&#8217;ve never lived in an Ethiopian village helping to carry water and I haven&#8217;t managed a team of 100 while we turned around a failing business.  I understand that these examples are the exceptions, not the norms&#8230; but I&#8217;m unsure as to how to make myself stand out as an applicant.  I definitely have passion, drive, motivation, and a million other traits that every applicant and their dogs claim to demonstrate, but I feel that this will definitely be the weakest part of my application.</p>
<p>Will above-average academic accomplishments in a business program combined with a demonstrated focus on globalization and cultural literacy help to balance out a personal statement that merely meets expectations rather than dazzling admissions officers?  As an example, I&#8217;ve spent four years learning a less-common language and will soon be departing to spend several months living in another culture.  Are these things helpful for an application?  And can I list intentions on my statement, or only accomplishments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faye Deal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Faye Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Dear SJ:

I&#039;ve re-read Asha&#039;s comment that you mention and I&#039;m going to interpret her remarks by focusing on her use of the word &quot;all&quot; when talking about science and engineering.  I personally believe that science /engineering backgrounds are valuable and most certainly are not viewed here at SLS as a weakness.  That said, though, not all science/engineering applicants come to the table with their best foot forward.  For example, I don&#039;t like to see an engineering major&#039;s transcript with only (or all -  here&#039;s my connection to Asha&#039;s comment) science-type courses.  I want to see you branch out of your safe and secure science world and take a walk on the wild side and enter the humanities world, for example.  Now, I know the engineering major does not leave a whole lot of room for exploring, but there is room and you should most definitely take advantage of that to round out your academic program of study.  Likewise, I like to see the English major take a walk on the wild side as well so this advice does not only apply to the science kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear SJ:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve re-read Asha&#8217;s comment that you mention and I&#8217;m going to interpret her remarks by focusing on her use of the word &#8220;all&#8221; when talking about science and engineering.  I personally believe that science /engineering backgrounds are valuable and most certainly are not viewed here at SLS as a weakness.  That said, though, not all science/engineering applicants come to the table with their best foot forward.  For example, I don&#8217;t like to see an engineering major&#8217;s transcript with only (or all &#8211;  here&#8217;s my connection to Asha&#8217;s comment) science-type courses.  I want to see you branch out of your safe and secure science world and take a walk on the wild side and enter the humanities world, for example.  Now, I know the engineering major does not leave a whole lot of room for exploring, but there is room and you should most definitely take advantage of that to round out your academic program of study.  Likewise, I like to see the English major take a walk on the wild side as well so this advice does not only apply to the science kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>sj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Dean Rangappa mentioned that engineering or science courses would not necessarily indicate a students&#039; ability to think as necessary for a legal profession (that&#039;s the understanding I got from above). Does this mean, then, that it is more of a weakness that a stregnth to pursue such an undergrad degree if hoping to enter law school soon after?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean Rangappa mentioned that engineering or science courses would not necessarily indicate a students&#8217; ability to think as necessary for a legal profession (that&#8217;s the understanding I got from above). Does this mean, then, that it is more of a weakness that a stregnth to pursue such an undergrad degree if hoping to enter law school soon after?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/2010/05/21/got-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/?p=43#comment-243</guid>
		<description>This is great! You guys are awesome for putting this together. I will be applying in the Fall and these were all questions I had or would&#039;ve had. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! You guys are awesome for putting this together. I will be applying in the Fall and these were all questions I had or would&#8217;ve had. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
